Brazil vs Serbia: Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled
Brazil
1.82 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Serbia
1.78 trillion current LCU
in 2022
Brazil rank
43rd
Serbia rank
44th
Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1.82 trillion current LCU against 1.78 trillion current LCU in Serbia, a difference of 32.76 billion current LCU.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 157 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 799.06 billion current LCU | 949.17 billion current LCU | 150.11 billion current LCU | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.24 trillion current LCU | 1.46 trillion current LCU | 214.01 billion current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 1.82 trillion current LCU against 1.78 trillion current LCU in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled between Brazil and Serbia?
- 32.76 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tax revenue (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.