Ecuador vs Jordan: Tax revenue (current LCU), per capita
Ecuador
852.84 current LCU per person
in 2022
Jordan
540.62 current LCU per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
150th
Jordan rank
152nd
Tax revenue (current LCU), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Jordan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 852.84 current LCU per person against 540.62 current LCU per person in Jordan, a difference of 312.22 current LCU per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.6 times Jordan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 152nd of 157 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 883.82 current LCU per person | 438.15 current LCU per person | 445.67 current LCU per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 777.29 current LCU per person | 500.7 current LCU per person | 276.59 current LCU per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenue (current lcu), per capita, Ecuador or Jordan?
- Ecuador, at 852.84 current LCU per person against 540.62 current LCU per person in Jordan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tax revenue (current lcu), per capita between Ecuador and Jordan?
- 312.22 current LCU per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for tax revenue (current lcu), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 152nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenue (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tax revenue (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.