Argentina vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
6.65 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Argentina rank
47th
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
48th

Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020062023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 333,380 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 47th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 48th of 157 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Congo, Democratic Republic of the in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Congo, Democratic Republic of the Difference Ahead
1990s 6,798 current LCU per square kilometre 123.99 current LCU per square kilometre 6,674 current LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 28,558 current LCU per square kilometre 183,061 current LCU per square kilometre 154,503 current LCU per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 330,080 current LCU per square kilometre 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 2.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.43 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.32 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Argentina, at 6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
333,380 current LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for tax revenue (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 47th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 48th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/">Argentina vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,577 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Tax revenue (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.