Afghanistan vs Zambia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Afghanistan
53.19 billion current LCU
in 2017
Zambia
53.08 billion current LCU
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
89th
Zambia rank
90th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Afghanistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 53.19 billion current LCU against 53.08 billion current LCU in Zambia, a difference of 108.20 million current LCU.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 89th and Zambia ranks 90th of 157 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.56 billion current LCU | 3.39 billion current LCU | 5.16 billion current LCU | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 26.63 billion current LCU | 10.37 billion current LCU | 16.26 billion current LCU | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Afghanistan or Zambia?
- Afghanistan, at 53.19 billion current LCU against 53.08 billion current LCU in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Afghanistan and Zambia?
- 108.20 million current LCU, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Afghanistan and Zambia rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Afghanistan ranks 89th and Zambia ranks 90th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.