Brazil vs Iceland: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Brazil
633.74 billion current LCU
in 2024
Iceland
486.56 billion current LCU
in 2023
Brazil rank
47th
Iceland rank
50th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Iceland
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 633.74 billion current LCU against 486.56 billion current LCU in Iceland, a difference of 147.18 billion current LCU.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 47th and Iceland ranks 50th of 157 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 346.30 billion current LCU | 259.93 billion current LCU | 86.37 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 460.35 billion current LCU | 403.35 billion current LCU | 56.99 billion current LCU | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Brazil or Iceland?
- Brazil, at 633.74 billion current LCU against 486.56 billion current LCU in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Brazil and Iceland?
- 147.18 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iceland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Iceland rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 47th and Iceland ranks 50th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.