Brazil vs Norway: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Norway
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 633.74 billion current LCU against 512.94 billion current LCU in Norway, a difference of 120.80 billion current LCU.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Norway ahead.
Brazil ranks 47th and Norway ranks 49th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 346.30 billion current LCU | 365.96 billion current LCU | 19.66 billion current LCU | Norway |
| 2020s | 495.03 billion current LCU | 477.24 billion current LCU | 17.79 billion current LCU | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Brazil or Norway?
- Brazil, at 633.74 billion current LCU against 512.94 billion current LCU in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Brazil and Norway?
- 120.80 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Norway?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Norway rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 47th and Norway ranks 49th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.