China vs Kazakhstan: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
China
5.69 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Kazakhstan
6.05 trillion current LCU
in 2023
China rank
19th
Kazakhstan rank
18th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 6.05 trillion current LCU against 5.69 trillion current LCU in China, a difference of 362.64 billion current LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 18th of 157 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.04 trillion current LCU | 1.48 trillion current LCU | 2.56 trillion current LCU | China |
| 2020s | 5.41 trillion current LCU | 4.03 trillion current LCU | 1.38 trillion current LCU | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, China or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 6.05 trillion current LCU against 5.69 trillion current LCU in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between China and Kazakhstan?
- 362.64 billion current LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- China ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 18th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.