Ecuador vs Latvia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Ecuador
7.58 billion current LCU
in 2022
Latvia
5.66 billion current LCU
in 2024
Ecuador rank
124th
Latvia rank
126th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 7.58 billion current LCU against 5.66 billion current LCU in Latvia, a difference of 1.91 billion current LCU.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 126th of 157 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.45 billion current LCU | 3.48 billion current LCU | 3.97 billion current LCU | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6.95 billion current LCU | 4.59 billion current LCU | 2.36 billion current LCU | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 7.58 billion current LCU against 5.66 billion current LCU in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 1.91 billion current LCU, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Ecuador ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 126th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.