Mexico vs Senegal: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Mexico
2.07 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Senegal
1.90 trillion current LCU
in 2023
Mexico rank
26th
Senegal rank
27th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Mexico
- Senegal
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2.07 trillion current LCU against 1.90 trillion current LCU in Senegal, a difference of 160.40 billion current LCU.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 26th and Senegal ranks 27th of 157 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.23 trillion current LCU | 1.08 trillion current LCU | 155.41 billion current LCU | Mexico |
| 2020s | 1.59 trillion current LCU | 1.57 trillion current LCU | 16.85 billion current LCU | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Mexico or Senegal?
- Mexico, at 2.07 trillion current LCU against 1.90 trillion current LCU in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Mexico and Senegal?
- 160.40 billion current LCU, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Senegal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Senegal rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Mexico ranks 26th and Senegal ranks 27th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.