Rwanda vs Serbia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled
Rwanda
1.02 trillion current LCU
in 2023
Serbia
1.19 trillion current LCU
in 2022
Rwanda rank
39th
Serbia rank
37th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.19 trillion current LCU against 1.02 trillion current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 167.34 billion current LCU.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 37th of 157 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 522.16 billion current LCU | 778.67 billion current LCU | 256.51 billion current LCU | Serbia |
| 2020s | 780.21 billion current LCU | 1.01 trillion current LCU | 225.43 billion current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.19 trillion current LCU against 1.02 trillion current LCU in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 167.34 billion current LCU, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Rwanda ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 37th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.