Brazil vs Lithuania: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita
Brazil
2,989 current LCU per person
in 2024
Lithuania
3,085 current LCU per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
114th
Lithuania rank
111th
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita over time
- Brazil
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 3,085 current LCU per person against 2,989 current LCU per person in Brazil, a difference of 96 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 114th and Lithuania ranks 111th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,721 current LCU per person | 1,452 current LCU per person | 268.69 current LCU per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 2,352 current LCU per person | 2,618 current LCU per person | 266.29 current LCU per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita, Brazil or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 3,085 current LCU per person against 2,989 current LCU per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita between Brazil and Lithuania?
- 96 current LCU per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lithuania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Lithuania rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 114th and Lithuania ranks 111th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.