France vs Mozambique: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita
France
3,383 current LCU per person
in 2024
Mozambique
3,514 current LCU per person
in 2024
France rank
103rd
Mozambique rank
102nd
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita over time
- France
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 3,514 current LCU per person against 3,383 current LCU per person in France, a difference of 131 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was France ahead.
France ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 102nd of 157 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,269 current LCU per person | 2,119 current LCU per person | 1,150 current LCU per person | France |
| 2020s | 3,398 current LCU per person | 3,223 current LCU per person | 175.71 current LCU per person | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita, France or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 3,514 current LCU per person against 3,383 current LCU per person in France as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita between France and Mozambique?
- 131 current LCU per person, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do France and Mozambique rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per capita?
- France ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 102nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.