Chile vs Singapore: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
39.66 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
16th
Singapore rank
17th

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Singapore
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197219972023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 39.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 4.52 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Singapore ahead.

Chile ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 17th of 157 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 37,047 current LCU per square kilometre 815,352 current LCU per square kilometre 778,305 current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 433,610 current LCU per square kilometre 2.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.11 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 3.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.50 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 8.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 20.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.22 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 35.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Singapore?
Chile, at 39.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Singapore?
4.52 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Singapore?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Chile and Singapore rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 17th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Singapore: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/singapore/">Chile vs Singapore: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,501 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.