Ecuador vs Namibia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
30,504 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Namibia
24,012 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
143rd
Namibia rank
144th

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
010.0k20.0k30.0k199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 30,504 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,012 current LCU per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 6,492 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 144th of 157 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 30,014 current LCU per square kilometre 14,767 current LCU per square kilometre 15,247 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 27,989 current LCU per square kilometre 16,197 current LCU per square kilometre 11,792 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Namibia?
Ecuador, at 30,504 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,012 current LCU per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Namibia?
6,492 current LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 144th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,501 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.