Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Malawi
9.50 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
10.11 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
30th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
28th

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M200920162023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 10.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.50 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 609,100 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 28th of 157 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 648,530 current LCU per square kilometre 2.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.88 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 2.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.56 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.57 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Malawi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 10.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.50 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
609,100 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for taxes on goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 28th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tanzania/">Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes on goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,501 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes on goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.