Czechia vs Kenya: Taxes on goods and services
Taxes on goods and services over time
- Czechia
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 946.63 billion current LCU against 841.77 billion current LCU in Czechia, a difference of 104.86 billion current LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 42nd and Kenya ranks 41st of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 603.80 billion current LCU | 509.22 billion current LCU | 94.58 billion current LCU | Czechia |
| 2020s | 727.02 billion current LCU | 816.92 billion current LCU | 89.90 billion current LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services, Czechia or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 946.63 billion current LCU against 841.77 billion current LCU in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services between Czechia and Kenya?
- 104.86 billion current LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kenya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Kenya rank globally for taxes on goods and services?
- Czechia ranks 42nd and Kenya ranks 41st of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General taxes on goods and services are taxes levied on the production, leasing, delivery, sale, purchase or other change of ownership of a wide range of goods and the provision of a wide range of services. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.