Eswatini vs Latvia: Taxes on goods and services
Taxes on goods and services over time
- Eswatini
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.66 billion current LCU against 4.64 billion current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 1.02 billion current LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 126th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 177.52 million current LCU | 1.54 billion current LCU | 1.36 billion current LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2.55 billion current LCU | 3.18 billion current LCU | 636.17 million current LCU | Latvia |
| 2020s | 4.56 billion current LCU | 4.29 billion current LCU | 264.44 million current LCU | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services, Eswatini or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.66 billion current LCU against 4.64 billion current LCU in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services between Eswatini and Latvia?
- 1.02 billion current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for taxes on goods and services?
- Eswatini ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 126th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General taxes on goods and services are taxes levied on the production, leasing, delivery, sale, purchase or other change of ownership of a wide range of goods and the provision of a wide range of services. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.