Latvia vs Tunisia: Taxes on goods and services
Taxes on goods and services over time
- Latvia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 6.93 billion current LCU against 5.66 billion current LCU in Latvia, a difference of 1.27 billion current LCU.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 157 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 550.69 million current LCU | 1.76 billion current LCU | 1.21 billion current LCU | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1.54 billion current LCU | 4.08 billion current LCU | 2.54 billion current LCU | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.37 billion current LCU | 6.36 billion current LCU | 3.99 billion current LCU | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on goods and services, Latvia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 6.93 billion current LCU against 5.66 billion current LCU in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in taxes on goods and services between Latvia and Tunisia?
- 1.27 billion current LCU, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for taxes on goods and services?
- Latvia ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on goods and services (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General taxes on goods and services are taxes levied on the production, leasing, delivery, sale, purchase or other change of ownership of a wide range of goods and the provision of a wide range of services. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.