East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Taxes on goods and services

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
26.4%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
41.2%
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Taxes on goods and services over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
01020304050199220072023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 41.2% against 26.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 14.8%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 41 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 32.8% 30.5% 2.3% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 32.0% 40.0% 8.0% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes on goods and services, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 41.2% against 26.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in taxes on goods and services between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
14.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for taxes on goods and services?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Taxes on goods and services. Statizoid, drawing on Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-percent-of-revenue/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-on-goods-and-services-percent-of-revenue/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Taxes on goods and services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)
Unit
% of revenue
Source
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
197 places, 5,703 data points, 1972–2024
Last refreshed

General taxes on goods and services are taxes levied on the production, leasing, delivery, sale, purchase or other change of ownership of a wide range of goods and the provision of a wide range of services. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of revenue which includes all transactions that add to the amount of economic value of a unit or sector.