Armenia vs South Africa: Taxes on international trade
Taxes on international trade over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 77.86 billion current LCU against 76.17 billion current LCU in Armenia, a difference of 1.70 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Africa ahead.
Armenia ranks 50th and South Africa ranks 48th of 155 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.72 billion current LCU | 20.32 billion current LCU | 1.40 billion current LCU | Armenia |
| 2010s | 56.83 billion current LCU | 43.49 billion current LCU | 13.34 billion current LCU | Armenia |
| 2020s | 72.25 billion current LCU | 66.06 billion current LCU | 6.19 billion current LCU | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on international trade, Armenia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 77.86 billion current LCU against 76.17 billion current LCU in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in taxes on international trade between Armenia and South Africa?
- 1.70 billion current LCU, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for taxes on international trade?
- Armenia ranks 50th and South Africa ranks 48th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on international trade (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on international trade are taxes that become payable when goods cross the national or customs frontiers of the economic territory or when transactions in services exchange between residents and non-residents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.