Botswana vs Egypt: Taxes on international trade
Taxes on international trade over time
- Botswana
- Egypt
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 24.21 billion current LCU against 21.87 billion current LCU in Egypt, a difference of 2.35 billion current LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 62nd and Egypt ranks 63rd of 155 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 785.96 million current LCU | 5.57 billion current LCU | 4.79 billion current LCU | Egypt |
| 2000s | 7.53 billion current LCU | 12.03 billion current LCU | 4.50 billion current LCU | Egypt |
| 2010s | 12.26 billion current LCU | 16.61 billion current LCU | 4.35 billion current LCU | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on international trade, Botswana or Egypt?
- Botswana, at 24.21 billion current LCU against 21.87 billion current LCU in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in taxes on international trade between Botswana and Egypt?
- 2.35 billion current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Egypt?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Botswana and Egypt rank globally for taxes on international trade?
- Botswana ranks 62nd and Egypt ranks 63rd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on international trade (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on international trade are taxes that become payable when goods cross the national or customs frontiers of the economic territory or when transactions in services exchange between residents and non-residents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.