Cape Verde vs Eswatini: Taxes on international trade
Taxes on international trade over time
- Cape Verde
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 6.59 billion current LCU against 6.38 billion current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 208.97 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 75th of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.12 billion current LCU | 4.93 billion current LCU | 192.16 million current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 6.56 billion current LCU | 5.74 billion current LCU | 819.34 million current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 6.59 billion current LCU | 8.36 billion current LCU | 1.77 billion current LCU | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on international trade, Cape Verde or Eswatini?
- Cape Verde, at 6.59 billion current LCU against 6.38 billion current LCU in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in taxes on international trade between Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 208.97 million current LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and Eswatini rank globally for taxes on international trade?
- Cape Verde ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 75th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on international trade (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on international trade are taxes that become payable when goods cross the national or customs frontiers of the economic territory or when transactions in services exchange between residents and non-residents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.