Egypt vs Equatorial Guinea: Taxes on international trade
Taxes on international trade over time
- Egypt
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 25.61 billion current LCU against 21.87 billion current LCU in Egypt, a difference of 3.74 billion current LCU.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Egypt ranks 63rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.03 billion current LCU | 10.08 billion current LCU | 1.95 billion current LCU | Egypt |
| 2010s | 16.61 billion current LCU | 21.38 billion current LCU | 4.77 billion current LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on international trade, Egypt or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 25.61 billion current LCU against 21.87 billion current LCU in Egypt as of 2022.
- What is the difference in taxes on international trade between Egypt and Equatorial Guinea?
- 3.74 billion current LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Egypt and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for taxes on international trade?
- Egypt ranks 63rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on international trade (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on international trade are taxes that become payable when goods cross the national or customs frontiers of the economic territory or when transactions in services exchange between residents and non-residents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.