South Korea vs Uzbekistan: Taxes on international trade (current LCU)
Taxes on international trade (current LCU) over time
- South Korea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 11.13 trillion current LCU against 7.02 trillion current LCU in South Korea, a difference of 4.10 trillion current LCU.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.6 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 155 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.05 trillion current LCU | 3.88 trillion current LCU | 5.17 trillion current LCU | South Korea |
| 2020s | 8.23 trillion current LCU | 6.81 trillion current LCU | 1.42 trillion current LCU | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes on international trade, South Korea or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 11.13 trillion current LCU against 7.02 trillion current LCU in South Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in taxes on international trade between South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 4.10 trillion current LCU, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do South Korea and Uzbekistan rank globally for taxes on international trade?
- South Korea ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Taxes on international trade (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes on international trade are taxes that become payable when goods cross the national or customs frontiers of the economic territory or when transactions in services exchange between residents and non-residents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.