Belarus vs Uganda: Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending
Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending over time
- Belarus
- Uganda
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -0.2258 against -0.2363 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0105.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Uganda ahead.
Belarus ranks 30th and Uganda ranks 32nd of 64 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.1805 | -0.1733 | 0.0071 | Uganda |
| 2020s | -0.2258 | -0.2363 | 0.0104 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending, Belarus or Uganda?
- Belarus, at -0.2258 against -0.2363 in Uganda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending between Belarus and Uganda?
- 0.0105, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Uganda ranks 32nd of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.