Latvia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending

Latvia
-0.2266
in 2020
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-0.211
in 2020
Latvia rank
31st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
29th

Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending over time

  • Latvia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-0.3-0.2-0.1-0199020052020

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports -0.211 against -0.2266 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0156.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 31st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 29th of 64 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1313 -0.2706 0.1393 Latvia
2000s -0.1723 -0.2848 0.1125 Latvia
2010s -0.1614 -0.2533 0.0919 Latvia
2020s -0.2266 -0.211 0.0157 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending, Latvia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at -0.211 against -0.2266 in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending between Latvia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0.0156, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending?
Latvia ranks 31st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 29th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-1-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-spending-percent-central/latvia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-1-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-spending-percent-central/latvia/united-kingdom/">Latvia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 1,123 data points, 1989–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.