Mexico vs Sweden: Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending
Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending over time
- Mexico
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -0.7825 against -1.12 in Mexico, a difference of 0.3375.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 56th of 64 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.8535 | -0.5729 | 0.2806 | Sweden |
| 2010s | -1.08 | -0.7076 | 0.3754 | Sweden |
| 2020s | -1.12 | -0.7825 | 0.3399 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending, Mexico or Sweden?
- Sweden, at -0.7825 against -1.12 in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending between Mexico and Sweden?
- 0.3375, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sweden?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Sweden rank globally for transfer dependency method 1, ratio of net transfers to own spending?
- Mexico ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 56th of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 1, Ratio of net transfers to own spending, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.