Brazil vs South Korea: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue
Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue over time
- Brazil
- South Korea
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -0.2995 against -0.3528 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0533.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 40th and South Korea ranks 42nd of 66 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.2169 | -0.2866 | 0.0697 | Brazil |
| 2020s | -0.2995 | -0.3528 | 0.0533 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Brazil or South Korea?
- Brazil, at -0.2995 against -0.3528 in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue between Brazil and South Korea?
- 0.0533, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Korea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and South Korea rank globally for transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue?
- Brazil ranks 40th and South Korea ranks 42nd of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.