Cape Verde vs Kiribati: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue

Cape Verde
0.0096
in 2017
Kiribati
0.1716
in 2020
Cape Verde rank
8th
Kiribati rank
5th

Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Kiribati
00.10.2200520122020

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.1716 against 0.0096 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.162.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 17.9 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 8th and Kiribati ranks 5th of 66 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Cape Verde or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.1716 against 0.0096 in Cape Verde as of 2020.
What is the difference in transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue between Cape Verde and Kiribati?
0.162, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Kiribati?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
How do Cape Verde and Kiribati rank globally for transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue?
Cape Verde ranks 8th and Kiribati ranks 5th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Kiribati: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-2-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-revenue-percent-central/cabo-verde/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-2-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-revenue-percent-central/cabo-verde/kiribati/">Cape Verde vs Kiribati: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
66 places, 1,149 data points, 1989–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.