Guatemala vs Kyrgyzstan: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue

Guatemala
-0.149
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
-0.161
in 2019
Guatemala rank
24th
Kyrgyzstan rank
25th

Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kyrgyzstan
-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05-0201320162020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports -0.149 against -0.161 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.012.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 25th of 66 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Guatemala or Kyrgyzstan?
Guatemala, at -0.149 against -0.161 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue between Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan?
0.012, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue?
Guatemala ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 25th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kyrgyzstan: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-2-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-revenue-percent-central/guatemala/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/transfer-dependency-method-2-ratio-of-net-transfers-to-own-revenue-percent-central/guatemala/kyrgyz-republic/">Guatemala vs Kyrgyzstan: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
66 places, 1,149 data points, 1989–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.