Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue
Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue over time
- Kiribati
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 0.8595 against 0.1716 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.6879.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 5.0 times Kiribati's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 5th and Marshall Islands ranks 2nd of 66 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 0.8595 against 0.1716 in Kiribati as of 2018.
- What is the difference in transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 0.6879, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for transfer dependency method 2, ratio of net transfers to own revenue?
- Kiribati ranks 5th and Marshall Islands ranks 2nd of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Transfer dependency method 2, Ratio of net transfers to own revenue, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.