Chad vs Solomon Islands: Universal right to vote in practice
Chad
2
in 2025
Solomon Islands
2
in 2025
Chad rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Universal right to vote in practice over time
- Chad
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2 against 2 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Chad ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Chad |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Chad |
| 1980s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 0.6 | 2 | 1.4 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.4 | 2 | 0.6 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0.6667 | 2 | 1.33 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Chad or Solomon Islands?
- Chad, at 2 against 2 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Chad and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Solomon Islands?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Solomon Islands rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
- Chad ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).