Congo vs Finland: Universal right to vote in practice
Congo
2
in 2025
Finland
2
in 2025
Congo rank
1st
Finland rank
1st
Universal right to vote in practice over time
- Congo
- Finland
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2 against 2 in Finland, a difference of 0.
Across all 144 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Finland |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1950s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 2 | 1.4 | Finland |
| 1970s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1980s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Finland |
| 1990s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Finland |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Congo or Finland?
- Congo, at 2 against 2 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Congo and Finland?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Finland?
- 144 years are reported by both, from 1882 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Finland rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
- Congo ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).