Lithuania vs Panama: Universal right to vote in practice
Lithuania
2
in 2025
Panama
2
in 2025
Lithuania rank
1st
Panama rank
1st
Universal right to vote in practice over time
- Lithuania
- Panama
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2 against 2 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Panama ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Panama |
| 1920s | 1.2 | 1 | 0.2 | Lithuania |
| 1930s | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Panama |
| 1940s | 2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | Lithuania |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Lithuania or Panama?
- Lithuania, at 2 against 2 in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Lithuania and Panama?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).