Andorra vs Tanzania: Universal right to vote
Andorra
2
in 2025
Tanzania
2
in 2025
Andorra rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Andorra
- Tanzania
How they compare
Andorra currently reports 2 against 2 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Tanzania ahead.
Andorra ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | Andorra |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Andorra |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Andorra |
| 1960s | 1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | Tanzania |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Andorra or Tanzania?
- Andorra, at 2 against 2 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Andorra and Tanzania?
- 0, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Tanzania?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Andorra and Tanzania rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Andorra ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.