Bahrain vs Equatorial Guinea: Universal right to vote
Bahrain
2
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
2
in 2025
Bahrain rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Bahrain
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.7 | 2 | 1.3 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Bahrain or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bahrain, at 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Bahrain and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Equatorial Guinea?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bahrain and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Bahrain ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.