Bahrain vs Uganda: Universal right to vote
Bahrain
2
in 2025
Uganda
2
in 2025
Bahrain rank
1st
Uganda rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Bahrain
- Uganda
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 2 against 2 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
Across all 132 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.7 | 2 | 1.3 | Uganda |
| 1980s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Uganda |
| 1990s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Uganda |
| 2000s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Bahrain or Uganda?
- Bahrain, at 2 against 2 in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Bahrain and Uganda?
- 0, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Uganda?
- 132 years are reported by both, from 1894 to 2025.
- How do Bahrain and Uganda rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Bahrain ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.