Benin vs Lithuania: Universal right to vote
Benin
2
in 2025
Lithuania
2
in 2025
Benin rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Benin
- Lithuania
How they compare
Benin currently reports 2 against 2 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Lithuania |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Lithuania |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Lithuania |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Lithuania |
| 1950s | 0.8 | 2 | 1.2 | Lithuania |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Benin or Lithuania?
- Benin, at 2 against 2 in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Benin and Lithuania?
- 0, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Lithuania?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Lithuania rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Benin ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.