Comoros vs Equatorial Guinea: Universal right to vote
Comoros
2
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
2
in 2025
Comoros rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Comoros
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 95 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Comoros ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Comoros or Equatorial Guinea?
- Comoros, at 2 against 2 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 95 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Comoros ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.