Croatia vs El Salvador: Universal right to vote
Croatia
2
in 2025
El Salvador
2
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
El Salvador rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Croatia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 2 against 2 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was El Salvador ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | El Salvador |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Croatia or El Salvador?
- Croatia, at 2 against 2 in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Croatia and El Salvador?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and El Salvador?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and El Salvador rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Croatia ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.