Djibouti vs Ecuador: Universal right to vote
Djibouti
2
in 2025
Ecuador
2
in 2025
Djibouti rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Djibouti
- Ecuador
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 2 against 2 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 141 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Ecuador ahead.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Djibouti |
| 1960s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Djibouti or Ecuador?
- Djibouti, at 2 against 2 in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Djibouti and Ecuador?
- 0, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Ecuador?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Ecuador rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.