Dominica vs Marshall Islands: Universal right to vote
Dominica
2
in 2025
Marshall Islands
2
in 2025
Dominica rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Dominica
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 2 against 2 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 102 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Marshall Islands |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Dominica or Marshall Islands?
- Dominica, at 2 against 2 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Dominica and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Marshall Islands?
- 102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
- How do Dominica and Marshall Islands rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Dominica ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.