Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
2
in 2025
Eritrea
2
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Eritrea rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2 against 2 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.
Across all 96 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Eritrea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | Eritrea |
| 1960s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Eritrea |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2 against 2 in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 96 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Eritrea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.