Eritrea vs Myanmar: Universal right to vote
Eritrea
2
in 2025
Myanmar
2
in 2025
Eritrea rank
1st
Myanmar rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Eritrea
- Myanmar
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2 against 2 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
Across all 107 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Myanmar |
| 1950s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Myanmar |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Eritrea or Myanmar?
- Eritrea, at 2 against 2 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Eritrea and Myanmar?
- 0, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Myanmar?
- 107 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and Myanmar rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Eritrea ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.