Estonia vs Seychelles: Universal right to vote
Estonia
2
in 2025
Seychelles
2
in 2025
Estonia rank
1st
Seychelles rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Estonia
- Seychelles
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2 against 2 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 109 shared years of data; in 1917 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Estonia |
| 1920s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Estonia |
| 1930s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Estonia |
| 1940s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Estonia |
| 1950s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Estonia |
| 1960s | 2 | 0.6 | 1.4 | Estonia |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Estonia or Seychelles?
- Estonia, at 2 against 2 in Seychelles as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Estonia and Seychelles?
- 0, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Seychelles?
- 109 years are reported by both, from 1917 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Seychelles rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Estonia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.