Eswatini vs Guinea: Universal right to vote
Eswatini
2
in 2025
Guinea
2
in 2025
Eswatini rank
1st
Guinea rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2 against 2 in Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 127 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 1st and Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Guinea |
| 1960s | 1.2 | 2 | 0.8 | Guinea |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Eswatini or Guinea?
- Eswatini, at 2 against 2 in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Eswatini and Guinea?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
- 127 years are reported by both, from 1899 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Eswatini ranks 1st and Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.