Gambia vs Monaco: Universal right to vote
Gambia
2
in 2025
Monaco
2
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
Monaco rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Gambia
- Monaco
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 2 against 2 in Monaco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 137 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Monaco ahead.
Gambia ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 15 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Monaco |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1960s | 2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | Gambia |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Gambia or Monaco?
- Gambia, at 2 against 2 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Gambia and Monaco?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Monaco?
- 137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Monaco rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Gambia ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.