Guyana vs Luxembourg: Universal right to vote
Guyana
2
in 2025
Luxembourg
2
in 2025
Guyana rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Guyana
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 2 against 2 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
Across all 134 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Luxembourg |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Luxembourg |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Luxembourg |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Luxembourg |
| 1950s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Luxembourg |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Guyana or Luxembourg?
- Guyana, at 2 against 2 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Guyana and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Luxembourg?
- 134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Luxembourg rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Guyana ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.