Hungary vs Lesotho: Universal right to vote
Hungary
2
in 2025
Lesotho
2
in 2025
Hungary rank
1st
Lesotho rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Hungary
- Lesotho
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 2 against 2 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Lesotho ahead.
Hungary ranks 1st and Lesotho ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Hungary |
| 1920s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Hungary |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Hungary |
| 1950s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Hungary |
| 1960s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Hungary |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Hungary or Lesotho?
- Hungary, at 2 against 2 in Lesotho as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Hungary and Lesotho?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lesotho?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Lesotho rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Lesotho ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.