Iran vs Kiribati: Universal right to vote
Iran
2
in 2025
Kiribati
2
in 2025
Iran rank
1st
Kiribati rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Iran
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iran currently reports 2 against 2 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Kiribati ahead.
Iran ranks 1st and Kiribati ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Iran |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1960s | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | Iran |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Iran or Kiribati?
- Iran, at 2 against 2 in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Iran and Kiribati?
- 0, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Kiribati?
- 134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
- How do Iran and Kiribati rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Iran ranks 1st and Kiribati ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.